When sections in underground mines are overstressed and pose hazardous conditions, there is a great deal at stake in terms of equipment, time and, most importantly, lives. Specialized numerical modeling tools have been developed over the years to predict stability and estimate stresses during the routine excavation of coal, simplifying the representational data extracted from the abundant variables measured. Mining engineers turn to four possible numerical modeling tools for analyzing stress: an empirical model that underlies the Analysis of Longwall Pillar Stability (ALPS) program; the 3-D displacement discontinuity program MULSIM/NL; the 3-D flexible overburden program LaModel; and the 2-D volume-element program FLAC.

Each of these tools has underlying assumptions that affect their calculated results, which may or may not be calibrated correctly to the current site. To determine which model most closely follows the actual stresses in the mine, engineers analyze the difference between real-life conditions and the calculated results of these models. Advanced graphing software equips mining engineers with tools needed to collect measurements from the mine and the resulting calculations, in order to present them in detailed, insightful graphs for proper analysis of the various numerical models.

Collecting a high volume of measurements is necessary to provide an accurate gauge of mining behavior and to calibrate numerical models adequately. However, the millions of points of calculated data produced from these modeling tools are staggering. In most cases, the output will not fit on a single sheet of a spreadsheet. Extraction of certain stress or displacement profiles from the spreadsheet requires exhaustive periods of time considering the thousands of models that are necessary. Additionally, the contouring capabilities of spreadsheets are poor, at best, or nonexistent.

In its place, data analysis and graphing software help to collect calculated results from the models and measurements of stress, displacement and load from the mine. Using scripting language for programming the analysis and graphing of data, mining engineers can then automate data import and extraction. This eliminates the time consuming task of manual data entry and the inevitable inaccuracies from human errors, which could have disastrous implications.

With advanced graphing capabilities, engineers can easily compare model output with measurements to determine whether a model was adequately calibrated. In addition, graphing software aids researchers to determine the appropriate constitutive laws or material strength models to use. A visual comparison of the calculated results from each model can clearly present conclusions as to which model most closely followed the measured mine activity.

“This graph depicts the distribution of stress increase with respect to the pre-panel phase of a longwall mining panel was developed for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (Use of this graph does not imply that NIOSH endorses OriginLab or its products.)

The manner in which research is presented can positively or negatively alter the perception of its validity. Researchers often think that basic graphing applications are adequate enough to fulfill their presentation needs. However, the resulting graphs tend to be quite simple and lack the flexibility necessary to properly express the true insight of the data.

The graph above depicts the distribution of stress increase with respect to the pre-panel phase of a longwall mining panel from the American west, with an instrument line noted in pink and the calculated MULSIM/NL model stress increase displayed in contours. This mining step shows the average location of the face when the instruments detected the stress increase reading of 20 psi. When comparing the MULSIM/NL model with actual measurements, the stress increase contour line approximately meets the location of the instruments, indicating that the rock mass stiffness for the MULSIM/NL model is calibrated in line with the measured stress profiles. Ultimately, professional presentations like this contour graph increase the credibility of the research it is displaying, and help mining project managers correctly calibrate numerical models.

The ultimate goal of this type of research is to better understand how to predict impending danger and what to do about it. Numerical models are only sufficient if they follow the rock mechanics of the mine. The insight extracted from these data and graphs help in calibrating the numerical tools and determining their limitations. Calibrating basic modeling parameters to in-mine measurements and determining basic material models of the coal present significant steps toward mitigating mining-induced hazards. The data collection, visualization and analysis provided by advanced graphing software will unquestionably be instrumental in future research to identify other geologic structural conditions that contribute to mining-induced, sudden release of seismic energy. Mining engineers tasked with safe excavation must ensure the proper model is chosen for the particular section of underground mine and create a viable, valid and informative model, which permits them to do so. With a site-specific, calibrated model, engineers can accurately anticipate impending collapses and prevent catastrophes that endanger mine workers, equipment and production.

Easwar Iyer is vice president of technology for OriginLab.